Planet Labs achieves $81.3 million in Q3 revenue, driven by defense sector growth and strong backlog, while anticipating continued profitability and expansion opportunities.

Future plans, estimates or expectations will be achieved. Such forward looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties and assumptions as detailed in our SEC filings which can be found at www.sec.gov. our actual results or performance may differ materially from those indicated by such forward looking statements and we undertake no responsibility to update such forward looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date on which the statement is made or to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events. During the call we will also discuss historic and forward looking non-GAAP financial measures. We use these non-GAAP financial measures for financial and operational decision making and as a means to evaluate period to period comparisons. We believe that these measures provide useful information about operating results, enhance the overall understanding of past financial performance and future prospects, and allow for greater transparency with respect to key metrics used by management in its financial and operational decision making. For more information on the non-GAAP financial measures, please see the reconciliation tables provided in our press release issued earlier this afternoon, which is available on our website at investors.planet.com Further, throughout this call we provide a number of key performance indicators used by management, often used by competitors in our industry. These and other key performance indicators are discussed in more detail in our press release and our earnings update presentation which are intended to accompany our prepared remarks at this point. I would now like to turn the call over to Will Marshall, Planet's CEO, Chairperson and Co Founder. Over to you Will.

Thanks Cleo and welcome everyone joining us today. It was another strong quarter, so let's dive in to briefly summarize the financials. We generated $81.3 million in revenue representing approximately 33% growth year over year, marking another quarter of growth acceleration. Non GAAP gross margin was 60% in the quarter and adjusted EBITDA profit came in at $5.6 million, representing our fourth sequential quarter of adjusted EBITDA profitability. Our backlog was $734.5 million at the end of the quarter, representing a year over year increase of 216%. Once again, we delivered positive free cash flow the third quarter in a row, reinforcing our expectation of being free cash flow positive for the full fiscal year. I'm particularly proud to report that with the strong performance in Q3, we are now also expected to be adjusted EBITDA positive in fiscal year 2026, an excellent milestone for the team as we work to strike a balance between profit and growth. Turning to sales highlights, I'll start with the Defense and intelligence sector where Q3 revenue accelerated to over 70% growth year on year, up over 15% quarter over quarter, all driven by strong performance in our data subscription and solutions businesses as well as our satellite services business. As previously announced, we were awarded a prime contract under the Luna B program by the National Geospatial Intelligence agency for a $12.8 million initial award with partner Simax. The award is for advanced analytics for maritime operations and reconnaissance. Under this program, we will provide the NGA with AI-enabled maritime domain awareness solutions which include vessel detections and monitoring over key areas of interest in the Asia Pacific. We're honored to have been selected and excited to be expanding this relationship. The National Reconnaissance Office renewed its baseline contract for PlanetScope broad area monitoring data under the Electro-Optical Commercial Layer program for $13.2 million through June 2026. If you were to annualize this award, the annual run rate would be approximately $21.1 million. For the high resolution component of our EOCL relationship, we have been awarded a framework contract which the NRO can utilize to order high resolution Pelican imagery. As a reminder, the EOCL program has been impacted by both the US Government shutdown and potential federal budget reductions. That said, we're encouraged by the continued engagement from this critical customer and see significant opportunities for growth in in that relationship in the future, particularly as this administration leans into leveraging commercial technologies. We also won an eight figure renewal with a long standing international defense and intelligence customer for high resolution imagery. As we announced last month and also as previously announced, we were awarded a six month $7.5 million contract renewal by the U.S. Navy for vessel detection and monitoring over key areas of interest throughout the Pacific. Finally, our global monitoring pilots with NATO and DIU have been progressing very well. We're pleased to share that last month we were awarded a seven figure expansion by NATO prior to the completion of our existing pilot for them. We're incredibly proud of this early traction and are working hard to continue delivering for these customers. More broadly, we continue to see robust demand for downstream products that embedded AI-enabled analytics on top of our daily scan for customers operations, enhance situation awareness and support informed decision making. Turning to the civil government sector where third quarter revenue was up approximately 1% year over year and up approximately 15% quarter over quarter. To share a recent highlight during the quarter, NASA awarded Planet Labs a one year $13.5 million task order under the Commercial Satellite Data Acquisition Program. As a reminder, this program has also been impacted by the US Government shutdown and potential federal budget reductions. Although this relationship has historically been an approximately $20 million annual run rate. We're very pleased to be continuing this important work with our partners at NASA and see opportunities to expand the relationship in the future. In fact, since the end of the quarter we have received an incremental CSDA Task order from NASA for disaster response. Under this new order, which is just under a million dollars in value, we will be providing high resolution tasked imagery to support disaster response and recovery, shifting finally to the commercial sector where revenue was moderately down both year over year and quarter over quarter. While this trend is expected given our increased focus on large government customers, we remain confident in the commercial sector as a significant market opportunity for planet, especially as we continue to advance our solution capabilities. We believe that AI enabled solutions we're developing for our government customers will enable us to deliver insights that can serve applications across a broad range of industries and use cases from supply chain security and optimization to insurance, finance, energy and agriculture, where we have had a number of marquee customers. Today, we expect these solutions will help unlock growth in the commercial sector, bridging the gap from data to insights for those customers to share a recent commercial highlight, we signed a new operational contract with AXA, one of the world's leading insurance groups. Following a successful proof of concept, AXA Digital Commercial Platform or DCP will integrate data from Planet basemaps, our medium resolution monitoring satellites and high resolution tasking fleets as well directly into its DCP Geo claims application to enhance claim processing efficiency and accuracy for property management. We've also signed a Strategic Marketplace Agreement which will add Planet's products to AXA's DCP platform, making them commercially available to AXA's vast client network of insurance partners. This partnership marks a major step forward in proactive data led resilience in the face of complex disaster and crisis management needs. Turning to our satellite services business, the team is continuing to execute well on our contract with jsat which once again contributed to revenue upside in the quarter. We've also began ramping for our German funded satellite services deal and saw a small contribution from that work in the quarter. As we've shared previously, we're seeing very strong demand signals for satellite services driven by our current geopolitical landscape and the demand for sovereign access to space. We continue to aggressively pursue strategic opportunities and the pipeline is robust. Turning now to the consistently remarkable execution of BIOS Space Systems teams, just 12 days ago we launched two of our high resolution Pelicans into orbit, bringing our commercial fleet size to five satellites. We also launched 36 superdoves which which will join our Broad Area Monitoring fleet We have successfully contacted all 38 satellites and they're now undergoing routine commissioning as they prepare to begin serving customers. We got first light down from the Pelicans the next day and we're excited to share initial images which you can find in the investor deck or on our IR website. We also recently announced plans to open a new Berlin satellite manufacturing for the production of next generation high resolution Pelican satellites in Germany. We expect to begin ramping operations next year with the aim to roughly double our manufacturing capacity and better meet growing demand from the European market. Now I want to provide a little more context on our two strategic projects that we announced in the quarter. Firstly, in October we announced owl, our next generation monitoring fleet to continue our unique broad area monitoring mission currently serviced by the Superdub fleet, but improving the resolution to 1 meter class, lowering the latency and significantly upgrading the onboard compute to incorporate Nvidia GPUs. OWL is designed from the ground up to address expanded applications ranging from security to disaster response to rapid change detection. The first tech demo is slated for launch later in calendar year 2026 and we're incredibly excited about the future of our daily monitoring solutions. Secondly, we've recently announced a funded R&D initiative with Google called Project Suncatcher. Suncatcher aims to enable scaled AI-computing in space by putting Google's Tensor processing units or TPUs on purpose designed satellites where they can leverage the energy of the sun and shed excess heat into the natural coldness of space. This was a competitive win for planet and our strong track record of building, launching and operating over 600 satellites to date. Together with our collaboration on AI enabled solutions represents a competitive edge underlying the depth of our experience and our agile aerospace approach. Suncatcher aligns well with our technology development roadmap for owl, leveraging the same satellite bus and is therefore highly synergistic. As previously announced, we're planning to deploy two prototype satellites in early 2027. We're excited to be working with our long term partner Google to develop this promising new technology. On the solutions side, I'm excited to share today that we recently closed the acquisition of Bedrock Research, an AI solutions company based in Denver, Colorado. Through our collaborations to date, Bevrot has successfully delivered for our existing defense and intelligence customers. From a team perspective, they have a rare deep expertise in the intersection of remote sensing, AI and national security. We've been very impressed with their team's agility, creativity and innovation. We view this as a strategically valuable capability and given the traction we're seeing in global monitoring. Bringing this expertise in house now will help us to accelerate our roadmap for AI enabled solutions and support our ability to efficiently scale to meet that market demand. We're thrilled to welcome the bedrock team to the planet organization to close out in Q3 we demonstrated continued momentum across the business driven by strong execution, strategic wins in the government sector and exciting new developments and technologies that we announced of Owl and Suncatcher. We believe we are well positioned for growth and profitability reinforced by our robust backlog and commitments to developing best in class solutions for our customers. I'm incredibly proud of our global team for the phenomenal execution and excited for what lies ahead. With that, I'll turn it over to Ashley to discuss our financials. Over to you Ash.

Thanks Will. I'll start by echoing Will's remarks and saying that Q3 was another outstanding, outstanding quarter with strong execution by our teams around the globe. I was particularly proud of our finance and operations teams who added to our list of accomplishments by raising $460 million of convertible debt in September and hosting a highly successful Investor Day at the New York Stock Exchange in October where we provided an in depth update on momentum in the business and our go to market focus. Turning to the quarter's results, as Will highlighted, revenue came in at $81.3 million representing approximately 33% year over year growth. The outperformance was driven primarily by our defense and intelligence and civil government customers as well as continued progress against our JSAT Satellite Services contract. We saw upside during the quarter from the Luno B win with the NGA as well as contribution from some one time factors which supported our better than expected results. During the third quarter. Revenue from the defense and intelligence sector grew significantly year on year driven largely by WINS with the NGA, the U.S. navy and international defense and intelligence customers. The commercial sector was down in part due to seasonality in the agricultural sector, in addition to our shift in focus towards larger accounts, civil government revenue was up modestly with strength from international customers in the sector, offset primarily by the end of our contract with Norway for their NICFI program program. We're pleased to see strong uptake of our AI enabled solutions in the government markets, contributing particularly to defense and intelligence wins in the quarter. Turning to our regional revenue breakdown, growth was distributed across the globe in the third quarter with approximate revenue growth of 38% year over year in both Asia Pacific and EMEA, 30% in North America and 7% in Latin America as of the end of Q3. Our end of period customer count was nine hundred and ten customers flat on a sequential basis, reflecting our direct sales team's intentional shift to focus on large customer opportunities and leveraging our self serve platform to provide access to data for our other customers. As a reminder, Planet Insight platform customers are not included in our end of period customer count. We continue to see strong revenue growth and thus a solid increase in average revenue per customer as a positive indicator that our sales team's focus on landing and expanding high value accounts is yielding results. As we shift to some of our ACV metrics, I want to remind you that the JSAT multi year Satellite Services contract is not included in our ACV metrics, although it is included in our RPOS and backlog, which we will discuss in a moment. Recurring ACV was 97% of our end of period ACV book of Business reflecting our continued focus on selling subscription data contracts and solutions as opposed to one time professional or engineering services. Approximately 83% of our end of period ACV book of Business consists of annual or multi year contracts lower than prior periods as we have seen a higher proportion of large shorter term government deals closed in recent quarters. Net dollar retention rate at the end of Q3 was 109% and net dollar retention rate with winbecks was 110%. Turning to gross margin, non GAAP gross margin for the third quarter was 60% compared to 64% in the third quarter of fiscal year 2025 reflecting investments in support of our satellite services contracts and the mix of contracts including AI enabled partner solutions. Our gross margins came in better than expected, primarily driven by the revenue outperformance in the quarter. Adjusted EBITDA profit was $5.6 million for Q3 better than expected, primarily driven by revenue outperformance in the quarter and disciplined OPEX spend. This marks our fourth sequential quarter of adjusted EBITDA profitability. Capital expenditures in Q3, which include our capitalized software development were approximately $27.7 million. This was above our guidance range, driven primarily by our decision to prepay for more favorable pricing in certain hardware procurements and launch deposits for our next generation satellites. As a reminder, we're currently in a growth CAPEX investment cycle as we lean into market demand and build out our next generation fleets. Turning to the balance sheet, we ended the quarter with approximately $677 million of cash, cash equivalents and short term investments, an increase of approximately $406 million sequentially. The increase is driven primarily by our convertible note raise. In September we achieved an excellent outcome, raising $460 million at a 0.5% interest rate for a five year term. Use of proceeds for the transaction are general corporate purposes with a portion of the proceeds used to purchase a capped call allowing us to avoid dilution up to a stock price of $18.04, providing net proceeds of approximately $406 million. This capital provides us a strategic asset in the form of a very strong balance sheet. Year to date we generated approximately $114 million in net cash from operating activities and $55 million in free cash flow. Our focus remains on managing the business to enable sustainable cash flow generation through efficient growth across our data solutions and satellite services revenue streams. At the end of Q3, our remaining performance obligations or RPOs were approximately $672 million up about 361% year over year, of which approximately 33% apply to the next 12 months and 59% to the next 24 months. We estimate our backlog, which includes contracts with a termination for convenience clause, to be approximately $734 million up about 216% year over year. Approximately 37% of our backlog applies to the next 12 months and 61% to the next two years. Let me turn now to our guidance for the fourth quarter and full year for fiscal 2026. In Q4 we're expecting revenue to be between $76 and $80 million which represents approximately 27% year on year growth at the midpoint and excludes many of the one time factors that drove upside. In Q3 we expect non GAAP gross margin for the quarter to be between 50 and 52% driven by our satellite services contract with JSAT and the mix of deals with AI enabled partner solutions and investments in our next generation fleets. Our range for adjusted EBITDA loss in the fourth quarter is expected to be between minus 7 and minus $5 million, reflecting our investments to drive sustained growth across both AI enabled solutions and our next generation fleets. We are planning for capital expenditures of approximately 22 to 26 million dollars in Q4. For the full fiscal year 2026. We now expect revenue to be between $297 and $301 million. This increase reflects our strong performance in Q3 and improved outlook for Q4 as we've seen some of our U.S. government contracts come in. We believe our backlog provides us with good visibility to sustain our Q4 revenue growth rate into fiscal 27 and achieve our revenue and adjusted EBITDA targets as shared at our Investor Day in October. You can find these details in our Investor Day presentation on our Investor Relations website. We are updating our guidance for non GAAP gross margin for fiscal 2026 to be between 57 to 58%, reflecting the better than expected gross margins during Q3. We expect our adjusted EBITDA profit for fiscal 2026 to be between 6 and $8 million, reflecting the strong performance we've seen throughout the year in revenue and cost efficiencies, even as we continue to invest in downstream solutions and our space systems capabilities. Achieving adjusted EBITDA profitability on an annual basis represents a major milestone in the company's maturity and reflects the hard work of our global teams in focusing our investments in the highest priority growth areas. We are planning for capital expenditures of approximately 81 to $85 million for the year as the increased investments we're making in our satellite fleets puts us in a strong position to meet accelerating market demand. As I mentioned earlier, we're also pulling forward some investments to take advantage of some favorable pricing opportunities. We continue to expect to be free cash flow positive on an annual basis this year. While quarterly results may vary due to the timing of cash collections, capex requirements and other factors, we remain focused on generating sustainable annual positive cash flow. As always, we're incredibly grateful for the ingenuity, collaboration and achievements of our Planet team. These stellar results were made possible by your hard work. Operator that concludes our comments. We can now take questions.

Thank you. We will now begin the question and answer session. Please limit yourself to one question and one follow up a reminder that if you would like to ask a question, please raise your hand. If you have dialed into today's call, please press star 9 to raise your hand. Star 6 to unmute. Please stand by as we compile the Q and A roster. And our first question comes from the line of Ryan Kuntz with Needham. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Great.

Thanks for the question. Terrific quarter, guys. Just outstanding in the October quarter. I wanted to ask about the guide a little bit here. You know, in terms of the revenue and the margin guide down is is the revenue down on on you know, one time benefits on usage in the past quarter and then the gross margin guide down, is that mostly tied to some of your large international programs? You're ramping.

Great. Thanks Ryan. Appreciate the question. In terms of Q3 to Q4 trends, a couple of factors to keep in mind. So I did highlight that There were some one time items in Q3 those can be related to renewals of certain contracts that have archived components. You know, anytime we have any kind of bonus payments or deliverables that can factor into a quarter that obviously wouldn't continue into the next. And then I mentioned there was some upside that was driven by the timing of landing new business that does continue into Q4 and you see that rolling through that's balanced against. We mentioned that both the NASA contract and the EOCL contracts were downsized. So we have to factor that revenue drop into the Q4 guide. And so that is fully factored into the guidance that we've given and that results in that quarter to quarter flatness just like down that that we guided to. In terms of margin, we're both investing in the opportunity that we see as as we've highlighted investing into execution against our satellite services contracts which continue to perform well and also with awards like LUNO B, those are with partners. And so we do have partner fees that go into COGS that get layered into Q4 and that also causes some margin compression. Quarter are the factors it really comes down to mix of business and the fact that we are investing because we see a lot of opportunity in front of us.

Great. Actually, thanks. And just a clarification on those partner fees. Are those front loaded in some way before revenue hits or how should we think about how those kind of behave in the future?

No, they. They align to revenue.

Okay, got it, got it. Perfect. And maybe a quick question on the acquisition of Bedrock. I mean which, which sectors are these guys focused on and what sort of data does Bedrock integrate?

Yeah, good question. I mean Bedrock is a fantastic. It's a small team but very, very talented at the intersection of remote sensing, AI and national security. Very, very good, solid team there. What we see them doing, I mean we already work with them on with actual customers as we're building out our GMS solutions. And it's been working really well and we. So we thought bringing them in house would help us to scale and speed that execution faster and make it more efficient to the margins point we were just discussing.

Got it. And what sorts of, well, what sort of data do they deal with? Is it all primarily your data or they bring other data sources together?

Well, they've done multiple different data sets in the past public and primarily through national security data sets on contract with the government. So it's a variety of things and it's sort of versatile approach that they've been doing using embeddings, a technology we've been also working with in our AI modeling work. And so it's the kind of very generic scalable solution that can work across different data streams.

Great, thanks Phil. Thanks, Ashley.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Edison U with Deutsche Bank. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you and congrats on the very impressive quarter. Want to ask about project Suncatcher there. There's been a lot of talk, a lot of excitement about, you know, data centers in space. Can you give us a sense on how you think about just the feasibility and viability of this and how does one kind of measure that going forward?

Yeah, well, thanks. On the quarter we agree it's really great. And yeah, Suncatcher is really exciting. I do think it's a very viable project long term. We have spoken in the space sector for some decades about how as space infrastructure costs come down, it eventually makes sense to put compute into space and other energy intensive infrastructure. And to your point about the feasibility of scaling it, well that is hard. Right. And there's only a couple of companies in the world that have done scaled Constellations basically U.S. and SpaceX. And therefore knowing how to put that get costs down is something that really is an incredible advantage. We have competitive position in going into this is one of the reasons obviously we're very proud that Google selected us. That's obviously one of the reasons for that. I see a huge market opportunity here, I do in the long run. This is just a R&D at this phase. This is an R&D contract. We're going to do these couple of demo satellites that would test out some of the critical components of that like shedding heat from the TPUs into outer space and doing the formation flying. So building towards a cluster system approach, which is the architecture that the Google and Planet teams have been designing towards and we think the most efficient approach to this. So yeah, so in summary, it's early days but an exciting potential project for Planet. Really exciting.

Just one follow up, I think you mentioned in the prepared remarks that you're using the same bus as Al.

Yes.

Are there any, are there any special kind of design changes you need to make on the bus? Anything you do differently? Just from I guess engineering perspective given it's a, it's a tpu.

Yeah, I mean there's a few things but not much on the scale of things. For example, we're expanding the number of solar panels a little bit and a few things like that, but on the scale of the hard complex things of the avionics and all those systems, how they work together, it's primarily the same at this stage. And that's why, I mean, you know, there was two big reasons we did this project at the tactical level. One was the how aligned it was to our OWL project per that point on the same bus. And the second is that it was an option on a big program in the future. You know, to the earlier point. I mean, I think this is a big market. So let's, let's take advantage of the fact that we're one of a couple of companies that can do it. I'll just add as well that, you know, Planet, we've been saying is a space and AI company. And I think, you know, we have the credibility to say that we're the first one in a way to prove that we've obviously got scaled satellite stuff. So we had space company but we've got at scale use of AI based on our daily scan. And we've already been putting in video chips in space on satellites, including the ones that were launched just 12 days ago. And so we already familiar with putting compute in space. So it's a natural extension of where we're going to think about AI and space together in this way. And so Planet is incredibly well positioned for that, we believe.

Thank you very much.

Thank you.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Mike Lattimore at Northland. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Excellent, thanks. Yeah, and excellent results. I guess on the quarter. I think you said JSAT was one of the drivers of maybe the upside. Can you talk a little bit about, you know, is JSAT sort of ahead of schedule and maybe just generally, how is the JSAT in Germany deals proceeding relative to maybe your internal timelines?

Yeah, you know, obviously this was the first time we had engaged in this type of contract. And so while we have obviously agreed milestones with the end customer, we gave ourselves some flexibility for when certain milestones might get hit through the year. And obviously that flexibility translates also into how we guide. And so that team continuing to execute and meet and hopefully exceed the customer's expectations also results in upside in our financial forecast. I would just add. Yeah, I mean overall things are going very well with those, those programs and you know, we're very focused on committed commitments to those customers. And yeah, things are going great and the pipeline of opportunities for this is going really well as well. So yeah, we're very happy with that side of the business too. Great.

And then Ashley, did you say that the you expect the fourth quarter kind of growth, implied growth rate to be sort of continue into fiscal 27, is that what you said?

I did, yeah. So as we're, you Know, as we're looking at the shape of the business and kind of the drivers of growth, you know, Q4 is pretty indicative of how we see things going forward. You know, obviously I've mentioned the change in the government contracts. You know, those go into full effect in Q4. We've obviously seen continue to land new business and expand relationships both with the US Government and international governments. And we expect, you know, across all of the areas of business to continue to focus on, you know, converting the pipeline that we have. So we're very comfortable. That is kind of a target for growth going into fiscal 27. And you know, also as we, as we think about margins next year, you know, that's a pretty good benchmark to use as a reference.

Yeah. And we said at the beginning of the year we would accelerate revenue growth rate and here we are and we can. It's nice to be in a position where we can see that continuing into the next year.

And then the only qualifier I'd add to that is reference back to the investor day materials where obviously, you know, we're thinking about FY27 very actively right now. And we continue to uphold a commitment to. Targeting EBITDA break even or better, as well as maintaining our annual cash flow positivity.

Okay, excellent. Congrats.

Thank you.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Colin Canfield with Cantor Fitzgerald. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Colin, are you there? You may be muted, Colin, you may have to unmute yourself.

Thank you. Apologies. Zoom mechanics. So just going back to the pipeline that you put together for the investor day, call it 20 contracts, average contract value of 170 million. That tracks pretty closely to the F35 friends and family. So as we think of drawing comparisons between that portfolio of opportunities and the companies that we're looking at, how do you think about the sizing and magnitude of those awards? Is it fair to assume that we could see, you know, 20% of that, of that pipeline convert and maybe, maybe the magnitude of that pipeline looking similar, you know, as a factor of the JSAT and Germany deal, such that Maybe it's like 100 million awards up front? Like, how do we think about kind of that? It's the timing and magnitude of that pipeline. Well, yeah, I mean, firstly, I mean, I think it's extremely, extremely well positioned for this market. I mean, our technology, I mean, we're the only ones that have built hundreds of Earth imaging satellites. We did 600 so far. So these companies, countries, when they want sovereign satellites, especially at least in optical with it obvious first call. And yeah, we feel well positioned against those 20 or so opportunities where we're focused on a half dozen or so that are a little bit more mature and of those ones are doing very, very well when we, when we really go in, I think we've got a higher probability than that. But you know we, time will tell exactly how, how, how this, this turns out. We are committed to really executing on this business side and being a reliable partner with these countries, building off a long term relationship we've, we've had with them in most cases. And so yeah, overall very, very good about where this can that answer your question? I'm not sure the subtleties in your question. I think, I think timing probably might be a little bit too aggressive in terms of answering the question. So good to hear that you're well positioned and looking forward to seeing those awards maybe pivoting to putting some numbers around Sun Catcher. So if we think of the 81 cluster concept, let's call it 250 to $300,000 per satellite, a million per cluster, is it fair to assume that that has some value capture tail on top of that such that it can be above. Call it an initial award of 81 million. And then just a high level question as we think of Google's R and D budget of call it 30 billion a year and the concept that a lot of these AI.

You know, people that are basically chasing data centers and the like are now pivoting that R&D spend from the development of the systems to the scaling of systems and that scaling of systems likely going through space infrastructure versus terrestrial. So maybe 81 million, is that fair or is it above that? And how do we think of kind of that longer term scaling opportunity into that Google R&D wallet? Got it. Yeah. Well, firstly, what we're on contract to do with Google is a couple of demo satellites. It's really just the testing early phase. We're not getting into the scale cluster. You're referring to the paper that they put out with where they were talking about 81 satellites in the cluster. That's more to do with the architecture that we're building long term. I think you're right to point out that this will, you know, this is, this will take significant R&D dollars and these companies are going to be willing to put dollars behind it because if it has the cost advantages which we believe it will and you know the experiments will need to show that we will. This is a scaled operation. It would require thousands of satellites and many Other things, it's just. But at this point we're very early, early on and I think, I think it's important to think about, you know, Google choosing us in this process is, is a huge compliment to us, of course, but one of the reasons is that one of the few companies that has done this at scale, as I said in my prior remarks. And so even though it's an R&D scale at this stage, we think we're one of the few players that can really build that out. It is not trivial to put up huge numbers of satellites in a cost efficient way. There's literally only a couple of companies in the world that have done that. And to boot, Planet, as I was mentioning in my earlier remarks, really the first proven space and AI company. We've already put fast processes in space. We already do a huge amount of AI work. And so our collaboration and a bunch of that AI work is with Google. We've got a partnership with the Gemini team and we've got a long trusted record working with them. So, you know, I think Planet is, is, is, you know, well positioned. Again, this is an early option, early contract on R&D, but it's an option on a big long term future. The Planet is well positioned to be taking part. Does that answer your question?

Yep, I think so. So thank you for the call, as always. Appreciate it. No problem.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Jeff Van Re with Craig Alum Capital. Your line is open. Please go ahead. Great, thanks. Thanks for taking the questions. Lamb, my congratulations. Just a few left for me. Will, on the compute front, you know, as it relates to, obviously congrats on what you're doing with Google and you've been ahead of that, embedding compute into your platform already. Just talk about the demand, demand, pull. You're pushing it. But to what degree are people ready to consume it? Demanding. Demanding it. Having use cases already pegged out and driving value from it.

You mean demanding compute in space? Yep.

Well, look, I mean this is really talking about. Putting compute in space because ultimately as launch costs and satellite infrastructure costs come down, it makes there's a point at which it becomes more economically feasible to put those entire data centers in space. So it's not about any particular compute demand, it's about the entire compute demand in principle. But that, you know, depends on us getting that cost threshold. You know, I think it's the position of Google and Planner that we are just, you know, a few years away from that. And therefore it's the right time to Starting to invest in that R and D. There are some types of compute demand that more lend themselves to space than others. But generally we're talking about.

You know, the entirety of that business. I would just, just say I think, you know, I think Sundar, you know, he was talking about this last week and talking about how in 10 years time he thinks most compute will be going up to space. So that's the way I perceive it too. So that's the way I think we should think about it. Does that make sense as opposed to any particular piece of the compute sector? Yeah, understood. That's fair. Two, last if I could then. One, as it relates to Pelican. Congrats. You know, real quick, first light image. Is there a, a number in the sky or a particular point in time this year? Just talk maybe to whatever degree you can share how that revenue layers in. If it just tends to be very gradual, if there are going to be lumps in that. So that would be the first question and then my last would just be on eocl. Obviously the cutbacks in the first place shocked everybody. Just wondering if you have any more clarity on what might replace what they've taken away, if there's any clarity there. So those two questions. Appreciate it.

Yeah, absolutely. Let me take the second one first. I mean. I just came back from D.C. and I can tell you that there is a lot of interest in this administration in leveraging new tech. To drive real mission value. In the DoD and we sit firmly in that area. And so we are seeing them leaning in. So despite what you're seeing there with the UCL A, it's growing, but more importantly, they are leaning in heavily. In fact. I mean, we see this of course in the numbers already. You know, the Lunar Award, the Navy expansion and so on. They're already leaning into this stuff. But I think we're going to see it in a big way.

Coming. So I think the outlook is really very positive. What was the first part of the question again?

First part of the question is as we continue to launch Pelicans, how do we see revenue flowing in? And I see it more gradual. Yeah. As we continue to bring on contracts, obviously if we land bigger contracts we talked about, we have a framework contract in place ready for Pelican or for High res in general. With USG under eocl, there's opportunities to expand that. There's opportunities obviously to expand with many of our existing customers and new customers. So nothing at this point that would, would cause me to say there's going to be irregularities in it. It's, it's. Yeah, I'd say it's roughly linear as we scale it and they're scaling as the sky sets are ramping down and then we're building towards what we've said before. Ultimately a 30 satellite fleet with 30 revisits a day, 30 minute latency and all this. And yeah, we're already seeing customers very excited about leveraging that data. And I'm glad you saw that first light as impressive as a team to bring that out the next day. I think the first light came out. So it's really fast how quickly they're able to process all of this and get those satellites up to. It's almost routinized at this point that we can launch these satellites and get them going. It's really cool.

Yeah, absolutely. Congrats on the quarter, guys.

Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you. And a quick reminder to keep it to one question and one follow up, please. Our next question comes from the line of Christine Lee Wegg with Morgan Stanley. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Great. Good afternoon everyone. Thanks for taking my question. I guess. Look, you've delivered four consecutive quarters of positive adjusted EBITDA and The loss for 4Q is really driven by incremental investment are all good problems. I was wondering, can you parse out how much These investments are for 4Q their duration into fiscal year 27? And if we take out these investments, would fiscal year 27 be adjusted EBITDA profitable? Thanks Christine. Appreciate the question. So first of all, at the investor day I talked about the fact that for fiscal 27 we are targeting.

EBITDA. Profitability is one of the metrics that as we're doing our fiscal 27 planning, we are keeping in mind so breakeven or better. So I'd urge you to look back at some of those materials where we talked about just general framing for thinking about that year. For Q4 specifically, it's kind of a step up as we're ramping up some new contracts and then scaling the revenue alongside of it. So as that revenue continues to scale, that gives us the opportunity to sustain these investments but get to that adjusted EBITDA break even or better goal. So really the key for us is balancing the opportunity for growth that we see with, you know, sustaining profitability across across the business. Hope that helps. Yeah, super helpful. And if I could do a follow on, you know, the exa contract that you mentioned earlier. If you think about the opportunity set for that kind of insurance type business when you sign on Incremental customers, how scalable is your capability set there regarding profitability? Like, would you sign on new customers and have incrementally higher profit? Like, how do we think about that versus incremental investments you would have to make if you sign on customers similar to what they're already doing?

Yeah, highly scalable. And I mean, the direct margins of this sort of data business is extremely high. I mean, in the 90s platform, what we did with AXA is really cool because just think about it very practically, they're trying to make claims processing more efficient. Take natural disasters like floods or fires have quicker assessments of losses and damages. And instead of people having to send individuals out to check, they can in many cases just check that with the satellite imagery automatically from their computer. I mean, this is a huge efficiency saving across a big business. That's why Axe has not just bought some data for their own use, they're also putting it on their platform. Exactly to your point about scaling it up to other insurance companies in their network, in their partner network, on their platform. So they're providing the platform and yet the incremental margins on that are really great. And you know, I've seen lots of potential customers like that in the future. We, we think the commercial business is going to continue to grow really well in the long term. And yeah, I mean, things like insurance and finance, we believe are massive markets for us to go over after. So hope that answers the questions.

Thank you. Very, very excited about that.

Great.

Thank you.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Trevor Walsh with Citizens jmp. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Great. Can you guys hear me okay? Yep. Cool. Thanks for taking the questions, I guess around the. The Luno B contract and the upside in the quarter for Will or for Ashley jump ball. But can, can you maybe explain or go in a little bit more detail as to how that just seems like a very. From kind of signing the contracting quarter and then having it immediately kind of lead to recognizing it seems like a nicer, just better, I guess, execution. And is it. Is that more. Is that actually what happened or was there some details around the PoC being set up beforehand and just kind of getting off with that customer right away? Specific to. To. To nga or. I guess I'm trying to understand if there's going to be more. More kind of potential with that, with some of these DNI customers where you kind of sign the deal and then leads to kind of immediate revenue impacts in that actual quarter. Thanks.

Yeah, I mean, look, we're ready to Go on these things. We've already got the data, we've already got the analytics so they can just turn it on. And the great thing, I mean sometimes the government can be slow initially, but when they go, it can just be straight away. And so we just turn it on. And that's exactly what happened in this case. You know, it's great to read that. We prime that and it's, you know, a really substantive award and it's in an area we've talked about that the NGA are leaning into broad area looking with AI on top. And it is an area that Planet believes we are, we believe we're, we're really well positioned to take. And you know, that's, that's for maritime domain awareness, a bit like our Navy program. And the Navy has subsequently in extensions been doing that as a sole source of war because we're the only ones that can do it. That also speeds things up faster. But yet the main ramp here is just because we were ready to go and as soon as they, they turned us on, we, we, we were on.

Terrific. Great. Thanks Will. That's really helpful. Color. Ashley, follow up maybe for you. Just circling back to JSAT and the Pelican revenues. Understand that the JSAT's not included in your ACV metrics as far as the recurring piece of revenue. But can you just help us understand or remind us exactly how as you build the 10 or so satellite specific to JSAT and that revenue flows in, is that going to create kind of a one time, you know, non recurring type of bump in a particular quarter which we won't really see in that ACV venture because you're not including that in there. And so in other words, you'd have a big revenue bump, but you still have, that's not recurring, but you have 97, you know, percent kind of similar to this quarter type of a metric. So not a good way to necessarily kind of track that, if that makes sense. Can you maybe just help us understand the, the dynamics there?

Yeah, happy to. And I mean basically you can see this in our, when we talk about RPOs and backlog and next 12 month revenue, it is more gradual. There might be some lumpiness quarter to quarter, but it's minimal. It's not something that's going to cause things to swing wildly. I would say the majority of our revenue still is coming from our traditional ACB business and it is a very good indicator that we use both on, you know, internal managing that growth versus profitability balance. Also looking at the health of the business looking at renewal rates and that recurring revenue. And then the nice thing about contracts like, like JSAT and other Constellation services contracts that were either, you know, engaged or pursuing is that it actually aligns the revenue quite nicely to the lifetime of the satellites. So while there is an upfront component of the revenue, there is also, you know, a managed component of the revenue that, that spreads the revenue over the lifetime of the satellites. So it's a mix. It's a little hard to overlay it directly to our traditional ACV metrics, which is why we exclude it. But it is still very predictable revenue and obviously enables us to accelerate the build out of that 30 pelican fleet that we, that we talked about, which we think gives us a great competitive advantage and competitive offering.

Great. Awesome. Super helpful. Thanks both for the questions. Great. Thanks Trevor.

Thank you. Your next question comes from the line of Greg Pendy with Clear Street. Your line is open. Please go ahead. A reminder to unmute yourself, Greg.

Hey guys, thanks for taking my question and congrats on the quarter. Just a real quick one. I think you mentioned there was some weakness in agriculture on the commercial side and some seasonality. Is that just the overall pressure we're hearing about in the agricultural sector? And could you just provide a little bit of color on that?

Yeah, sure. Actually it's not weakness, it's seasonality and it's just the timing of deliverables usage around those contracts. As I, as I've mentioned, we get these annual commit contracts but some of them are recognized ratably and some of them are recognized based on usage depending on the nature of the product that the customers purchased. And so in this case you see a lot of usage in the harvesting or pre harvesting periods for operational efficiencies and then you see that drop off as you get later into the harvesting cycles. And so that's just seasonality that we would expect year to year. Actually we're pleased with the stability that we're seeing in the agricultural business and I think that's largely driven by the shift that we've made over the last couple of years to move out of more of the marketing arms of the agriculture sector and really be embedded into the operations of our, of our customers. So I'm actually very pleased with the progress we're seeing in the ag sector and see that as a potential growth vector for us in the future.

Yeah, if I just have one more thing, it's that we have figured out how to align our business model with theirs and now we believe we're in A stronger position to help serve that market. But you're right that the overall segment has been having challenges.

That's very helpful. Thanks a lot.

Thank you. Our next question comes from the line of Chris Quilty with Quilty Space. Please. Your line is open. Please go ahead.

Thanks, guys. Following on the earlier talk of the pipeline, you know, 170 million dollar deals and the fact that you're doing the factory expansion in Berlin, what do you expect you'll need in terms of production rate and is that, you know, where are you at today and where do you expect to scale in the next year and is that sufficient capacity with those two facilities? You know, should the the opportunity show?

Yeah, well, obviously we are building those facilities both of our expansion here and what we're doing in Berlin. Exactly. To build towards the demand that we expect to see. So yeah, we're obviously trying to do that. As I think we said at the time of announcing the Berlin manufacturing site, that that will roughly double our capacity to build the Pelican satellites. And excited to say we're making some really good headway there. Found the place and now our next year will be going into operations there. So excited by that. But yeah, we're obviously trying to match that demand. We are seeing very strong demand. For deals that include building new satellites and for deals that involve leveraging existing satellites. Both. Remember, there's a mix between those two and that affects whether or not we have to launch new satellites. But on both sides we're seeing good traction. And I think what's great about this pave the capex of our of deploying that 30 satellite fleet or more. You know, I think that we're in a great position. With so much demand there that will help build out our full fleet.

And I would, I would just add to that, Chris, that the team is does a really good job of making these different fleets very synergistic. So just as a reminder, the Janitor leverages the same as the Pelican. We highlighted that we're leveraging the owl bus for the Suncatcher program. And that enables us to also be very efficient in how we utilize space both for the R and D front and the manufacturing side. So it enables us to run a pretty efficient operation through and through.

Gotcha. But again, Will said he doubled you'll double production to no number given. But I was just asking for a number.

Yeah, I don't want to specify that right now just because of competitive reasons.

No, fair enough. And you know, again on the tanager, any update there? I mean, Are you finding a killer app market or application? You know, with the Hyperspectral, what are your thoughts on, on scaling with the technology?

Yes, well, Tanager just got to its first year of being in orbit. Had great traction. So first so far. You know, one of the things we're really pleased about is our California partnership, a powerful proof point that has shown that they are able to find methane leaks across California, stop them, have real incremental benefits for both those businesses as well as for the environment. And we're committed under that program to do the first four of those challenges. Yeah, so it's, it's obviously, as we've said before, that's a very new kind of capability, hyperspectral imagery. But so far the results have been really impressive. The signal to noise ratio on that satellite, the quality of the data is producing, that is. And it's been beyond what we, our expectations. And the users are starting to report good results and not just in the civil government side. We have early interest in the defence and intelligence sector as well.

Great. And congrats on the Pelican turnaround on First Light, I think. Was it a record? Yeah, certainly.

Yeah, I think that might have been our record. I mean, the team just keeps on getting better and better. I mean, I mean, just to put it in perspective, when I started in the space sector, you know, a couple of decades ago, this was a really complex process, planning for launch. And now it's and, and commissioning and all of that process and our team does this in their sleep at this point. It's incredible how, how well we do these operations and I'm incredibly proud of how quickly they then efficiently they build the satellites, get them to the launch vehicle, launch them, commission them, contact them, commission them and then provide those capabilities to customers rapidly. And yeah, continue to get, continue to be impressed by that.

Gotcha. And we've got the. Is it the next two satellites going up will be next gen, 30 centimeter. And can you just remind us what is the fundamental difference in the driver for the improvement? Is it altitude, you know, taking the satellites down below 420 or is it some change to the payload itself that you've learned from the first iteration?

Yeah, it's both. It's upgraded telescopes on those future generations, those V2s as we are flying them lower as well. So yeah, it's a bit of both. So some of those improvements can happen with existing satellites and some of those improvements have to wait for later satellites. But we will be doing those next year. I won't go into more details, but it's, it'd be exciting to have them up too.

Very cool. Looking forward to it. Thanks.

Thank you.

That is all the time we have for questions today. I will now turn the call back to Will Marshall, CEO and co founder, for closing remarks.

Thanks, operator. Yeah, so I think in summary, Q3 was another excellent quarter for the company. The business is humming both across the data and solutions business, which we see rapidly scaling. We saw the NATO expansion, the LunarV award and more. Those are those efforts in AI enabled solutions are paying off. And the satellite services. We have strong execution and a strong and maturing pipeline. It was great to see us all of this leading to us beating our revenue guidance again in Q3 and raising our forecast for the full year. Given our robust backlog and recent government wins. We're excited to share that we believe that we're well positioned to continue the end of year growth rate into next year. And since last quarter closed, we launched those 38 satellites and brought in Bedrock and announced Suncatcher with Google, which is a new and exciting R and D initiative at scale but a lot of promise for the future. So the the team is just executing at pace. I'm incredibly proud of everyone for the phenomenal execution this quarter and excited for what lies ahead. Thanks again for joining everyone.

This concludes today's call. Thank you for attending. You may now disconnect.