Hudbay Minerals shows resilience in Q3 2025, reaffirming production guidance while improving cost outlook amid wildfire disruptions and strategic Mitsubishi partnership.

Good morning ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to the Hudbay Minerals third quarter 2025 results conference call. At this time all participants are in listen only mode and following the presentation we will conduct a question and answer session. To join the question queue, you may press Star then one on your telephone keypad. Should you need assistance during the conference call, you may reach an operator by pressing Star then zero. I would like to remind everyone that this conference call is being recorded today, November 12th at 11:00am Eastern Time. I would now like to turn the conference over to Candice Brulee, Senior Vice President, Capital Markets and Corporate Affairs. Please go ahead. Thank you operator. Good morning and welcome to Hudbay Minerals's 2025 Third Quarter Results Conference Call. Hudbay Minerals's financial results were issued this morning and are available on our website at www.hudbay.com. a corresponding PowerPoint presentation is available in the Investor Events section of our website and we encourage you to refer to it during this call. Our presenter today is Peter Kukilski, Hudbay Minerals's President and Chief Executive Officer. Accompanying Peter for the Q and A portion of the call will be Eugene Lee, our Chief Financial Officer, and Andre Lauzon, our Chief Operating Officer. Please note that comments made on today's call may contain forward looking information and this information by its nature is subject to risks and uncertainties and as such actual results may differ materially from the views expressed today. For further information on these risks and uncertainties, please consult the company's relevant filings on SEDAR+ and EDGAR. These documents are also available on our website. As a reminder, all amounts discussed on today's call are in US Dollars unless otherwise noted. And now I'll pass the call over to Peter Kukilski.

Thank you Candice Good morning everyone and thank you for joining us for today's call. The third quarter was a quarter of resilience for HUD Bay as we demonstrated the company's strong operating capabilities and the benefits of our diversified operating platform as we faced mandatory wildfire evacuations in Manitoba and temporary operational interruptions in Peru. The agility of our teams and continued dedication to driving efficiencies and reliable performance helped to minimize the impacts to our operations due to these external events. This has allowed us to maintain the low end of our consolidated copper and gold production guidance ranges for 2025 and we have been able to significantly improve our consolidated cost guidance for the second time this year, which is truly remarkable given the circumstances. We continue to take steps to reduce long term debt while reinvesting in high return growth initiatives across the organization. We are delighted to have secured Mitsubishi as a premier long term partner for our Copper World project this quarter enabling us to unlock significant value in our copper growth pipeline. This transaction further solidifies our financial strength and significantly reduces our share of future equity contributions for the development of Copper World. We look forward to continuing to work with Mitsubishi under this strategic partnership as we advance Copper World towards a sanction decision in 2026 and first production in 2029. HUD Bay's unique diversification in copper and gold coupled with our relentless commitment to cost control enables us to maintain industry leading margins and deliver strong and stable cash flows. Slide 3 provides an overview of our third quarter operational and financial performance. Our operations in Manitoba showed remarkable resilience against unprecedented wildfires, prioritizing the safety of our people and communities. In Peru, the team navigated regional social unrest and temporary interruptions to deliver gold productions far exceeding quarterly cadence expectations. And in British Columbia our team made progress with the SAG mill conversion project called the SAG 2 project to enhance mill throughput and drive future cash flow generation in light of temporary operational interruptions and production deferrals. Our diversified asset portfolio delivered consolidated copper production of 24,000 tonnes and consolidated gold production of 54,000 ounces in the third quarter. Consolidated copper and gold production was lower than the second quarter primarily due to the impact of the wildfire disruptions that persisted in northern Manitoba for a majority of the third quarter as well as the temporary production interruption in Peru for nine days during the quarter. In addition, mill maintenance and increased processing of lower grade stockpiles at Copper Mountain contributed to low quarter over quarter production. Consolidated silver production was 730,000 ounces and zinc production was 548 tonnes in the quarter. Adjusted EBITDA was $143 million in the third quarter, a decrease compared to the second quarter primarily due to the temporary operational interruptions I mentioned as well as lower sales volumes as a result of a delayed 20,000 dry metric tonne copper concentrate shipments in Peru with high gold content valued at approximately $60 million. This shipment was expected to be sold at the end of September, but ocean swells at the port prevented it from being loaded and shipped until early October. Cash generated from operating activities was $114 million in the third quarter and operating cash flow before change in non cash working capital was $70 million. Adjusted net earnings were $0.03 per share in the third quarter after adjusting for various non cash items on a pre tax basis including a $322 million impairment reversal related to Copper World, a $15 million contingent payment received from a non core asset sale and various mark to market adjustments during the third quarter, we continued to demonstrate industry leading cost performance with consolidated cash costs of $0.42 per pound and consolidated sustaining cash costs of $2.09. These costs increased compared to the prior quarter primarily as a result of lower gold byproduct credits in Manitoba, partially offset by strong gold production in Peru. While we have reaffirmed our consolidated full year production guidance for all primary metals and we are anticipating strong production in the fourth quarter, we now expect consolidated full year copper and gold production to be near the low end of the guidance ranges. We believe our ability to maintain our initial production guidance in the face of the recent operational interruptions is remarkable and I am extremely proud of the team. With the strong cost performance at all our operations year to date and increased exposure to gold byproduct credits, we have further improved our full year consolidated cash cost guidance to a range of $0.15 to $0.35 per pound of copper from the previously reduced range of 65 cents to 85 cents per pound. We are also improving our consolidated sustaining cash cost guidance range to $1.85 to $2.25 per pound of copper from the original guidance range of $2.25 to $2.65 per pound. Along with these operating cost improvements, we are also expecting total capital expenditures to be $35 million lower than the original guidance primarily due to deferring certain expenditures to 2026. This includes $15 million in reduced sustaining capital expenditures as a result of the temporary operational interruptions and $20 million in lower growth capital expenditures that have been deferred to 2026. Turning to Slide 4, we continue to further reduce debt during the quarter despite lower consolidated free cash flows. Our Peru and Manitoba operations generated positive free cash flow in the quarter despite the temporary production interruptions. This was offset by our continued investment in optimizing our British Columbia operations with the planned STRIPPING activities. Consolidated free cash flow would have been positive if the excess copper concentrate inventory in Peru was sold at the end of September. To continue our prudent balance sheet management, we repurchased and retired $13.2 million of senior unsecured notes through open market purchases at a discount to par during the third quarter. Following the quarter end, we repurchased and retired an additional $20 million in senior unsecured notes, reducing our total principal debt levels to $1 billion. Since the beginning of 2024, we have reduced total debt and gold prepay liabilities by approximately $330 million. We ended the quarter with total liquidity of $1.04 billion, including $611 million in cash and cash equivalents and undrawn availability of $425 million under the revolving credit facilities. As of September 30, our net debt to EBITDA ratio was 0.5x. We expect liquidity to be further enhanced upon closing of the CopperWorld joint venture transaction which is anticipated to close in late 2025 or early 2026. Our strengthened balance sheet will allow us to continue to prudently reinvest in our portfolio of attractive high return brownfield and greenfield opportunities to drive production growth and long term value creation. Taking a look at our Peru operations on Slide 5, we delivered steady operating performance despite facing temporary interruptions due to social unrest. The operations produced 18,000 tonnes of copper and 26,000 ounces of gold during the third quarter as well as 577,000 ounces of of silver and 195 tonnes of molybdenum. Countrywide protests that began early in the third quarter temporarily impacted the transportation routes leading to limitations of supplies and concentrate transportation. To manage through these limitations, we adjusted mine sequencing to prioritize Pampacunta mining activities and blend stockpile ore in the mill feed. In late September, the social unrest escalated across Peru and along with other mines in the southern mining corridor, our Constancia mine was impacted by local protests and illegal blockades. The safety of all our personnel is our top priority, so we suspended operations on September 22 as a precaution. During the temporary downtime, the team performed preventative maintenance at the mill and on certain mining equipment. Since the restart of mining activities on October 3 and milling activities on October 5, the Constancia operations have normalized. I am extremely proud of our resilient team in Peru and the way they continue to navigate the dynamic environment. Quarterly copper production was lower than the prior quarter primarily due to low ore milled as a result of this temporary operational shutdown, while gold production was higher due to stronger head grades from a larger contribution of the mill feed coming from Pampacancha. The fourth quarter is expected to be the strongest copper and gold production quarter this year in Peru. Production in the month of October totaled approximately 9,000 tonnes of copper and 17,000 ounces of gold reflecting optimal mill ore feed. With continued strong ore contribution from Pampacancha and lower stockpiled ore being processed, we remain on track to achieve full year copper production guidance in Peru while gold production is now expected to be above the top end of the 2025 guidance range. Mill throughput averaged approximately 76,000 tonnes per day in the third quarter, lower than the second quarter due to low ore mined and the temporary operational shutdown. Milled copper grades decreased by 9% compared to the second quarter as a result of the stockpiled ore feed partially offset by higher grades from Pampacancha. Milled gold grades significantly increased with a higher portion of ore feed from Pampacuntia where the gold grades are meaningfully higher than any other ore sources. Mill recoveries of copper were impacted by the nature of stockpile feed, while gold and silver recoveries were in line with metallurgical models. The road blockades along the transportation route reopened midway through the quarter, allowing us to reduce site concentrate inventory levels and replenish supplies. However, as I mentioned earlier, ocean swells at the port late in the quarter impacted sales volumes with a 20,000 tonne copper concentrate shipment being deferred to early October. Cash costs were $1.30 per pound during the third quarter, decreasing from the prior quarter with higher gold byproduct credits and lower plant maintenance costs as planned. With cash cost continuing to outperform the low end of the cash cost guidance range, we are reaffirming our full year cash cost guidance in Peru, moving to our Manitoba operations on slide 6. I want to first thank the regional operating team for all their efforts in safeguarding the company's assets and completing an efficient, orderly resumption of operations. I can't imagine what our employees and their families had to endure during these unprecedented wildfires and we will continue to do our part to support the rebuilding efforts in the communities and the provinces. And I will say again how proud I am of the continued resilience demonstrated by our Manitoba team and the successful restart of operations in late August following the lifting of mandatory evacuation orders. The operations produced 22,000 ounces of gold, 800 tons of copper, 500 tons of zinc and 102,000 ounces of silver in the third quarter lower than the second quarter due to the two month wildfire evacuation that deferred gold production. A business interruption insurance claim has been submitted to compensate for a portion of the Wildfire related downtime. Total ore mined at Lalor reduced by over 50% during the quarter due to the temporary operational interruption. Gold grades increased by 9% compared to the second quarter while copper, zinc and silver grades were in line with the mine plan expectations. Consistent with our strategy of allocating more LALA ore feed to New Britannia to maximize gold recoveries. The New Britannia mill achieved average throughput of approximately 2,300 tons per day over the operating period in the quarter and gold recoveries were a record 92% reflecting the increase in gold grades. The stall mill experienced a greater throughput impact from the Wildfire shutdown as the Lalor mine prioritized mining from the gold zones over base metal zones to ensure a consistent feed to the New Britannia mill. The team focused on process optimization and enhanced gold recovery initiatives, enabling record gold recoveries of 73% at stock stall in the third quarter. Gold cash costs for the third quarter were $379 per ounce decreasing compared to the second quarter primarily due to the higher byproduct credits and the recovery of secondary gold products as a result of mill tank cleanouts. While the Manitoba operations were previously tracking within the 2025 guidance ranges despite the significant impacts from Wildfire evacuations, we are now expecting to be slightly below the low end of the gold production's guidance range as a result of a week long power outage in October from severe winter storms that further deferred gold production. With year to date cash costs continuing to outperform the low end of the cash cost guidance range, we are reaffirming Our full year 2025 cash cost guidance range in Manitoba. Given the strong cash cost performance to date in Manitoba, HUD Bay will continue to prioritize primary gold production over byproduct zinc production in 2025 and full year zinc production is now expected to be below the low end of the guidance range. Looking at our British Columbia operations on Slide 7, we continue to focus on advancing our optimization plans at the Copper Mountain Mine. This includes a ramp up of mining activities to optimize ore feed to the plant and implementing site improvement initiatives that mirror Hud Bay's best in class operating practices. In the third quarter the British Columbia operations produced 5.2 thousand tonnes of copper, 4.8 thousand ounces of gold and 51,000 ounces of silver. Production decreased compared to the prior quarter primarily because of restricted mining efficiencies and lower grades as higher waste stripping continued. The waste stripping activities are part of the continued execution of the accelerated stripping program intended to bring higher grade ore into the mine plan in 2027. During the third quarter we made significant progress on the key mill improvement project, completing the initial phase of the SAG 2 mill conversion in July. The subsequent ramp up demonstrated positive contribution from SAG2 during the quarter with several days achieving 50,000 tons per day of mill throughput in September. The team continues to optimize the circuit as planned through the remainder of 2025, with the final phase of the project involving the conversion of an interim feed arrangement to a permanent configuration. Construction remains on target for completion in December 2025. In late September, the primary SAG mill, which I will refer to as SAG1, required unplanned maintenance due to localized damage to the feed head. After completing the repairs in mid October, SAG1 restarted at a reduced rate under enhanced monitoring controls. SAG1 throughput will continue to ramp up over the course of the fourth quarter. Together with the completion of the final phase of the SAG2 projects, HUD Bay expects mill throughput to ramp up towards 50,000 tonnes per day by mid-2026. Total ore processed in the third quarter was 6% higher than the second quarter, reflecting the completion of the first phase of the SAG2 project partially offset by planned and unplanned maintenance. During the third quarter, copper recoveries were 77% and gold recoveries were 59%, both lower than the prior quarter due to the processing of lower grade stockpile material. British Columbia cash costs were $3.21 per pound in the quarter higher than the prior quarter largely due to lower copper production and lower byproduct credits. Fourth quarter production is expected to be impacted by a lower mill throughput from reduced levels at SAG1 in October which together with a higher portion of ore milled from low grade stockpiles this year is expected to result in full year copper production in British Columbia to be below the low end of the guidance range. Cash cost continue to track well versus the guidance range and therefore we are reaffirming full year cash cost guidance in British Columbia. Turning to Slide 8 as I mentioned briefly in my opening remarks, our Copper World project in Arizona achieved a significant milestone this quarter with the announcement of our 30% strategic joint venture with Mitsubishi. We welcome Mitsubishi's world class expertise as we work together to advance this high quality copper project and unlock significant value for all our stakeholders. This strategic partnership validates the attractive long term value of Copper World as a top tier copper asset and endorses the strong technical capabilities of HUD Bay. Mitsubishi is acquiring its 30% stake for an initial contribution of $600 million. This deal will provide $420 million in cash once it closes and $180 million within 18 months of its closing. These proceeds will be used to fund the remaining feasibility study and pre sanction costs in addition to initial project development costs for Copper World. Mitsubishi will also fund its pro rata 30% share of future capital contributions. This valuation is highly attractive to HUD Bay as it implies a significant premium to consensus net asset value for CopperWorld. As a result of the JV proceeds and future capital contributions, HUD Bay's estimated share of the remaining capital contributions have been reduced to approximately $200 million based on pre feasibility study estimates. It also defers our first capital contribution to 2028 at the earliest and significantly increases the levered IRR to HUD bay to approximately 90%. With recent achievement of our stated balance sheet targets, we have successfully completed the key elements of our prudent financing strategy as part of our 3P plan. We are very well positioned to build one of the next major copper mines in the United States while continuing to maintain a strong balance sheet to reinvest in other growth opportunities across our portfolio. While continuing to delever Copper World feasibility activities are underway and we are on track for the completion of a definitive feasibility study in mid-2026. We have accelerated detailed engineering, certain long lead items and other derisking activities with the additional $20 million in growth capital expenditures announced in August. We continue to expect to make a Copperworld sanctioned decision in 2026 as part of our long term growth pipeline. Slide 9 summarizes the threefold strategy we are executing in Snow Lake as part of the largest exploration program in the company's history history in Manitoba the first objective is to execute near mine exploration at the Lalor and 1901 deposits to enhance near term production and further extend mine life. We completed the development of the initial exploration drift at 1901 earlier this year and the development of the haulage drift is underway. Positive initial step out drilling from the exploration drift was achieved earlier this year and during the third quarter some additional zinc development ore was delivered for processing at stawell. Activities at 1901 over the next two years will focus on exploration definition drilling, ore body access and establishing critical infrastructure for full production in 2027. Exploration activities will also target additional step out drilling to potentially extend the ore body as well as complete infill drilling to convert inferred mineral resources in the gold lenses to mineral reserves. The second strategic focus area is on testing regional satellite deposits within tracking distance of the Snow Lake processing infrastructure to identify potential additional ore feed to fully utilize the available processing capacity. With our significant Snow Lake land package we have an attractive portfolio of regional deposits including the Talbot rail, Pen 2, Watts 3 zone and Wim deposits. The most advanced of these satellites is The Talbot deposit, which I'll discuss further on the next slide. And the third strategic focus is on exploring our large land package for a new potential anchor deposit to significantly extend the mine life of our Snow Lake operations. We are conducting the largest geophysics program in our history in Snow lake, consisting of 800 km of ground electromagnetic surveys and an extensive airborne geophysics survey. In July we commenced exploration drilling at the Talbot Copper zinc gold deposit. Talbot is located within tracking distance of the Snow Lake processing facilities, making it an ideal deposit to potentially provide supplemental feed to our stall mill. The current phase of the drilling program includes four drill rigs intended to complete 10 holes by the end of the year. After completion of the initial three holes, we are pleased to see that the core logging has confirmed the continuity of the Talbot copper gold mineralization, the depth and look forward to receiving the full assay results later this year. This drilling will determine the future scope requirements for a pre feasibility study which we intend to initiate in 2026. In January 2026 we expect to kick off phase two of the Talbot drilling program focused on infill drilling to support the pre feasibility study concluding on slide 11. This quarter demonstrated the benefits of HUD Bay's diversified operating base, our unique copper and gold exposure and our resilient operating capabilities. Our continued focus on cost control enables us to maintain industry leading margins and deliver strong and stable cash flows. Once Copper World is in production, we expect our annual copper production to grow by more than 50% from current levels. This will reinforce our position as one of the largest America's focused pure play copper producers with a well balanced and geographically diversified portfolio of assets. Our expected production will be weighted approximately 1/3 in each of Canada, the United States and Peru. And the significant increase in copper production from Copper World will further enhance HUD Bay's exposure to copper. With more than 70% of consolidated production and revenue expected to be derived from copper, HUD Bay's existing strong operating platform in tier one mining jurisdictions and resilient balance sheet offers significant upside potential for further value creation at higher copper and gold prices. We will be able to prudently advance Copper World while also being able to invest in many other high return growth opportunities to unlock value across the portfolio and create meaningful value for all our stakeholders. And with that we are pleased to take your questions.

Thank you ladies and gentlemen. We will now begin the question and answer session. To join the question queue you may press star then one on your telephone keypad you'll hear a tone acknowledging your request. If you're using a speakerphone Please pick up your handset before pressing any keys. To withdraw your question, please press star then two. Our first question is from Lawson Winter with Bank of America securities. Please go ahead.

Thank you very much, operator and good morning, Peter. And then hello, Eugene and Andre. Nice to hear from you guys today. I wanted to ask first about Copper Mountain. So the construction decision, can we expect that to occur in mid-2026? And then just thinking about spending around Copper, Copper World this year or in 2026, do you expect any pre construction spending that could occur in advance of the completion of the feasibility study in a construction decision? Thank you.

Morning, Lawson, and thanks for the question. So the first part of your question. Is yes, we do expect to complete the feasibility study in mid-2026, and we expect a construction decision in 2026 as well. One of the comments that we made during the, during my comments was that we did authorize an additional $20 million this year to get ahead of some of the long lead items and engineering items associated with the critical path of the project. We also expect to be spending a fair amount of money, pre sanctioned money I guess you would call it, in order to keep things moving and in order to make sure that we address the critical path properly. So yeah, the answer in your question for short, in short is absolutely, we will spend on developing the project in conjunction with doing the feasibility study. Now remember that we are following an integrated project development approach, which means that the engineers, constructors, etc are all in an integrated team. And so we are able that way to advance certain elements of the project ahead of others where there's risk. So 50%, roughly, engineering will be completed before the end of the feasibility study, but in some areas as much as 70% will be completed. So we are very much taking sort of a holistic approach to make sure that we address the critical path and spend on the right things even before the Final Investment Decision decision.

Okay, that's helpful. And then just a clarification. The 20 million, will some of that be in 25 or will that all be in 26? Hi Lawson, it's Eugene here. So the original budget for this year for Copper World was $90 million and we increased that to $110 million as part of that decision to make some long lead items. If you look at the slide that we show in terms of the total funding, there's approximately $150 million in total spending from January 1, 2025 until the sanctioning decision expected in mid-2026. So you would, from the money that we've outlined, there's a total of $150 million. We expect to spend about 100 million of that this year and with 50 remaining in the first half of 2026 to be in a position to sanction Copper World along the timelines that Peter outlined. Okay, yeah, that's very helpful. Thanks for highlighting those notes. I just hadn't noticed them yet. And then same question, but I just wanted to ask about capex. So you deferred 35 million of sustaining capex into 2026. The original budget for this year was about 365. So should we think about sustaining capex in 2026 as 365 plus the 35 from this year? Or are there some other puts and takes there we should be considering? And what are they?

Hi, it's Andre. So. So there is some of it like some, some of the capex. There is a little carryover, but a lot of the capex were actually deferrals related to the wildfires in Manitoba and some of the tailings with some of the blockades in Peru. So those things are just kind of offset and there's not an increase. It's just the mine plan is just continuing. So Manitoba restarted their operations and ramped back up, but they're not developing at a rate that's higher than what they did historically. So it's just a sliding of a lot of that.

So to break that $35 million down for you, Lawson, is $15 million in deferrals and sustaining capital. But that's not additional capital. So you don't add it, you don't just add it to 2026 as Andre mentioned. And then of the remaining 35, $20 million relates to growth projects that, that, that were deferred, that will be deferred in 2026. So that, that's not new capital again, that's capital that will just be not spent in 25 and spent in 2026. Yeah, that's super helpful. And then just ultimately what I was trying to get at is like a good baseline for sustaining capex for next year. Then would be basically this year's guidance of 365 plus or minus, say 5%. Is that fair? We haven't finished all the budgeting for next year, but that's a fair amount. I think every year there's in Peru, depending on the year, it's whether there's a tailings dam raise or not, the capital will fluctuate by, you know, between 20 and $30 million. And in Manitoba, it's been fairly stable at this level and in B.C. while we're continuing the stabilization program, it's going to be at this level until, until the end of 26, as we've kind of mentioned, on a three year plan basis. So I think your assumption is fairly consistent. Okay, thank you all very much. I appreciate it.

The next question is from Ralph Profidi with Stifel Financial. Please go ahead.

Thanks, operator. Good morning, Peter. It's been sort of surmised that some. Of the issues in Peru are around informal mining and regulations therein. Just wondering, can you discuss a little bit about informal mining practices in and around Maria Reina and Coballito? Is this a significant issue that may need to be considered when we talk about the consulta previa process?

Hi Ralph, it's a great question. Look, actually there's been a fair amount of informal mining around Maria Reina and Caballito for a long time since actually since before we acquired the mineral rights for the assets. I would say that the informal miners do not constitute a material impediment to our ability to get permits or go through the consulta previa process or get access to explore. In fact, you know, a lot of the work that we've done with the community is to try to prepare the communities to be able to support us with drilling themselves. And it would make sense that it might be the informal miners who actually do some of the work for us. So in general, I would say that to answer your question, that informal miners are absolutely not an impediment to getting the consulted preview done. It's just more complicated right now given the social environment in Peru, change of government, etc. Etc. To get the government to conduct the consulta previa process, to get everybody together and to ultimately get the nod that the service rights were required without coercion. Or anything like that. What I would say about Peru also is that there's no difference today to the way it's been for the last 25 years. And the term that I would use to characterize it is stable instability. It's, you know, I've spoken many times about the time that I've spent in Peru with a pendulum swinging left and right and left and right. And the one thing that stays the same is, or two things that stay the same in the fiscal environment, but also the bureaucracy. And what's really important is that stable bureaucracy to get things done. But the timelines are very, very difficult to predict, especially now with elections coming up next year and the equation of the informal miners, how that plays into the broader social environment. But I don't think there's any direct impact on the prior consultation process. There were small scale miners on Papacancha prior to our permitting and accessing it. And so they are a stakeholder and we successfully navigated that in the past. Great.

Thank you for that clear understanding. That's it for my questions.

Thank you, Ralph.

Next question is from Oris Dwakado with Scotia Bank Wiscosia Bank. Please go ahead.

Hi, good morning. Maybe just shifting gears to Copper Mountain. The asset seems to be underperforming your expectations since you acquired it. Can you give us a sense of the Sag Mill issue that you disclosed here most recently? Is this now going to negatively impact 26? And I'm wondering if we should already start thinking about the low end of the Copper Mountain Production guide for 26 based on this issue.

Thanks, Orris. So the first thing that I would say is that we are highly confident that Copper Mountain was the right asset to purchase. We believe strongly that the skill set that HUD Bay brings to bear will ultimately be fully realized in value at Copper Mountain. Like we said, it's a three year optimization or stabilization and optimization process. We start sort of two years into it. There's a good year to go and. There'S a lot of work to be. Done and there will be some puts and takes. I think Andre always explained it as being, you know, when you renovate a house, you find a few things when you pull the sheetrock off the walls, etc. But we'll get there. But Andre, maybe you can provide a little bit more color.

Yeah, yeah, yeah. No, as you're saying, I was thinking that TV show, love it or list it and we love it. We love it. And there's. And it is very much, you know, it's a journey. And so I'll talk to the event there, Orisa, and to your specific question, but I would say if I start with is there's been tremendous progress throughout the course of the year that the team's done an excellent job on navigating a whole number of challenges and opportunities. And in terms of ramping up the mine and the mine was under stripped and there's smaller benches and they're working through a lot of that. And so we've seen steady progress in that we delivered SAG2 ahead of schedule or on schedule back in July and ramping that up where initially when we envisioned this, we weren't even going to turn it on until the end of the year. And it's proved to be you know, fruitful around that optionality as we got into this, the SAG1 incident if you will, that was described Peter, earlier on in the discussion. And so what it appears to have happened with that example is and we've done a lot of investigation, there's more investigation to understand is just it was a premature liner wear and it's the same set of liners and it wasn't wearing the same as what we had thought previously. It's the same tonnage and it appears that our operational excellence in terms of we introduced something called a mill flies or to really run a real stable, efficient operation. And what we ended up seeing, which we didn't anticipate was a little bit more selective wear rather than wear throughout the liners and it caused that incident. It caught us a little bit by surprise. They've repaired it. We've gone through in a very cautious, meticulous ramp up process. We're ramping up to date. We're almost at the level right now of where we were call it the average of prior to Q3. So it's a ramp up. Is there a bit of an impact to next year? A little, but not significant. And so the unknown for us is like the ramp up on SAG 2 on the combined of SAG 2 and SAG 1 exceed our permit capacity for Copper Mountain. And so we were cautious in the wording. You know, as you know we're generally conservative operators and we want to deliver what we say. And so we're confident in the forecast that we put to the end of the year and then we'll update more. We're going to know a lot more going into when we set guidance on next year. But so like we said we're pretty confident on hitting that by mid year up to that 50,000 tons a day.

Okay, thanks. Good luck.

No luck needed but it's good. A lot of hard work. But I appreciate the.

The next question is from Marciel Farid with Goldman Sachs. Please go ahead.

Thank you. Morning everyone. So just on Peru, obviously you've adjusted the mining sequence in the third quarter towards the high grade Pampa Concha deposit. Just trying to minimize impacts from the interruptions. Right. But just trying to understand, I mean you mentioned on the release that October the ramp up can still has been quite well Just trying to understand if you're confident that you can get back on track throughout the fourth quarter of the year at Constancia. Thank you.

Sure Sandra, I'll take the question. So absolutely confident as you know saw in the press Release the month of October as we disclosed the highest copper production for the year. You know, from we're into the high grade cycle. The team has, you know, done an excellent job. You know, I could never imagine them running with three shovels and producing at the levels that they have at Pampacancha and, you know, thoroughly impressed by the team. And so Papa Concha is going at a very, very high rate. Could finish it potentially by the end of the year, which was the original plan, by the way. So the team is. Has basically caught up. And so that cadence is why we're seeing high copper grades through to the end of the year as well as the high gold. So, as you know, Pampacancha has really contributed to us exceeding the high end of guidance on gold for Peru.

Marcia, it's Peter. As Andre says, we are highly confident in our ability to the ball out of the park with Constancia for the remainder of the year.

Great. Can I just follow up on Manitoba as well? Obviously gold grade has been quite strong. Just trying to understand if you can maintain and sustain that level at around 5 grams per tonne, what does the mine plan look like for Manitoba? Thank you.

So I'll add in if you can add if I missed something there. So Manitoba, like again, resilience. The team, unfortunately, with the wildfires going into the year, we were on track to see gold, the high end of guidance, you know, and that's why, you know, despite being down for two months with the evacuations, we're still in really, really good shape and the team is ramped up. We are in a high grade cycle right now. You know, I won't say the grade because you'll project it to the end of the year, but we are in a very, very high grade cycle of both copper and gold right now. And the mill is to that extent. We have to slow down the Brit because the grade was a little bit high, but overall, very confident in the grade to deliver to the end of the year and meet our gold consolidated. Guidance, as we said.

I would add, Marcia, that the average grade that in the mine plan is. 4 and a half to, to 4.6. Grams per tonne, which is the basis for our mine plan. And you know, we expect to average those grades through the fourth quarter throughout 2026.

Yeah. Great. Thank you.

Welcome.

The next question is from Martin Pradier with Veritas Investment Research. Please go ahead.

Hi. Thank you. Some of my questions have been answered, but in terms of the Q4 for BC, are you expecting to be lower than Q3 because there's a couple of moving parts. I think you have lower grade and the throughput, I think it should be. Higher because now you have the second mill. So I'm just trying to understand that.

Sure. Right. It kind of answered the question. The reason why we're saying we're rated going to be at the low end of Copper guidance is because it is. We're dealing with that situation that I described on the ramp up. So the incident that happened at the sag1 mil was right at the end of Q3. So there will be compensating effects, like sag2 is compensating for Segwyn, but the throughput is built into that projection of achieving that low end of copper guidance on a consolidated. On a consolidated basis. So that's why we're telegraphing that B.C. was going to be below the low end on its individual guidances because of that incident. Otherwise we would have been in a good spot. So the ramp up's ongoing. Right now we're quite pleasantly surprised and pleased with the team on how quickly they're ramping up. But there is an impact in the quarter and that's why we're telegraphing to the low end of Copper guidance consolidated.

Yeah, I understand that. But you expect it to be higher or lower than Q3.

So we are running SAG 2 in Q3. So. And so. And SAG 1 was running at its typical capacity. It's not running at full capacity right now. It's still. We're in the ramp up mode. And so it's not. It's going to be close, but it's probably a little bit less. But the grade is in this quarter is different than in Q3. I'd say the grade compensates for it because we're mining a lot of low grade stockpiling in Q3 and we are seeing a bit higher grades than normal right now. So they kind of balance each other off. It's not our strongest one from bc, you know, and that's why we telegraphed it to the bottom end.

Great, thank you. That's very helpful.

The next question is from Fahad Tariq from Jefferies. Please go ahead.

Hi, thanks for taking my question. Just coming back to Pampacancha in the fourth quarter, how should we be thinking about mining rates? Like, is it going to be similar. Levels to the third quarter? That was my understanding from the answer to the previous question.

Yes. Yep. Yes, that's fair.

That's fair. Okay. And then the remaining feed, should we assume that the Constantia pit is the remainder Versus being stockpiled in the fourth.

Quarter, we're back mining in Constantia. So it's a mixture of the two. Whatever makes the most sense. But yes, we're back in Constantia for the remainder.

Okay, great. And then just unrelated, but switching gears to Manitoba. Can you just let us know how much you expect to receive from the insurance claim related to the wildfires?

It's a bit premature to give you. A number, but as you know, we have good coverage that covers both property and business interruption and business interruption has a 30 day standard deductible. So we're really grateful that there wasn't any significant damage on a property basis and given our proactive defense activities. And so we submitted a claim and we'll get you a number kind of in 2026, but premature to give you an exact number today. Okay, fair enough. Thank you.

Once again. Any analyst who has a question can press star then 1. The next question is from Stefan Ioanno with Cormac Securities. Please go ahead.

Thanks very much. Maybe a tough one to answer, but just, you know, when we think about growth and the next steps for HUD Bay, should we just assume in the near term all hands on deck are going to be focused solely on Copper World or should we start to think about maybe more news or thought or consideration given the other projects or assets in the company's portfolio?

Morning, Stefan. Thanks for the question. I so the one thing that we've. Tried to make very, very clear is with having retired the 3P plan, now having procured the joint venture partner for Copper World, we are now in an extremely strong position to be able to fully fund Copper World as well as to to pursue high return, low risk brownfields production improvement projects across the portfolio. So I think what you'll see is. That we talked today a little bit about the exploration efforts that are underway with advancing 1901, et cetera, et cetera. We've got the pebble crushing circuits in Peru next year, a bunch of these things. So I think you can be assured that we will continue to invest in the portfolio as well as to continue pushing Copper World. Remember, Copper World is one single integrated team and we are a decentralized organization. With different business units who will continue to pursue. There are other projects.

Yeah, Stephan, if I could add to that, you know, we're in a really enviable position with our strong balance sheet and cash balance where we're going to be able to build Copper World with very little capital till 2028. We're going to be able to build Copper World, reduce our leverage delever and allocate capital to other business units so that we're able to reinvest in building up additional production capacity in Manitoba, in bc, in, in Peru and advance even Mason. So I think it's a really enviable position where coming out of the decade we will have built Copper World, have lower debt and invested in all the other areas and built up our entire business. And that was the benefit of bringing in this joint venture partner to fund a significant portion of the copper world capital was because we saw so much opportunity within our portfolio to invest to grow the other parts of the business as well. And it's pretty exciting for us to be in this position to be able to do that. Okay, great. That's very helpful. Thanks very much, guys.

Welcome.

This concludes the question and answer session. I'd like to turn the conference back over to Candice Boulay for any closing remarks. Thank you, operator. And thank you everyone for joining us today. If you have any further questions, feel free to reach out to our investor relations team. Thanks and have a great day. Ladies and gentlemen, this concludes the conference call for today. You may now disconnect your lines. Thank you for participating and have a pleasant day.